BMC Demolishes Parts of Ajay Devgn’s Juhu Bungalow Over Alleged Unauthorised Construction
The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has removed portions of actor Ajay Devgn’s bungalow in Mumbai’s Juhu neighbourhood after alleging that construction work at the property was carried out without the necessary civic approvals. The action followed a stop-work notice issued by the municipal body, which said alterations were under way without permission.
The case has drawn attention because it involves a prominent Bollywood figure and a well-known residential area. However, the BMC’s stated concern is a familiar one across Mumbai: building work must comply with municipal rules, and property owners are expected to obtain the required approvals before making structural changes.
What the BMC Says Happened at the Property
Devgn’s bungalow, measuring about 7,802 square feet, is located within Kapole Co-operative Housing Society in Juhu. According to the civic body, officials found construction-related activity at the property that had not been authorised by the municipality.
The work identified by the BMC reportedly included internal alterations, the installation of partition walls, changes to windows and other structural modifications. Such work can require formal approval, particularly when it affects a building’s layout or structural elements. The specific permissions needed depend on the nature and scope of the proposed changes.
On September 10, the BMC issued a notice under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. The notice instructed that work stop immediately and asked for relevant plans, documents and permissions to be submitted to the civic authorities.
Officials Took Action After the Notice
The BMC said construction continued despite its direction to halt the work. Civic officials later visited the bungalow and acted against the portions they considered unauthorised. Footage from the location showed workers using a hammer to dismantle parts of the construction.
The demolition is a municipal enforcement action based on the corporation’s assessment of the work. The BMC’s notice and subsequent response underline the importance of following the approval process before carrying out renovations, especially when changes may affect a building’s structure or external features. Details about any response from Devgn or his representatives were not included in the information available about the action.
For homeowners, the episode is a reminder that even work described as an interior renovation can raise regulatory questions. Partition walls, window changes and structural modifications may fall under different rules, so residents are generally advised to check with their housing society and local authorities before beginning construction.
Why the Juhu Case Has Attracted Public Attention
Juhu is one of Mumbai’s most recognisable residential districts, home to film personalities, business leaders and long-established housing societies. When civic authorities take action at a celebrity-owned property, the story quickly becomes a topic of public interest. Yet the underlying issue is not unique to the entertainment industry: municipal bodies across the city regularly inspect buildings and respond to suspected unauthorised alterations.
Mumbai’s dense urban environment makes building oversight particularly significant. Changes to a property can affect neighbouring residents, shared spaces and the safety or appearance of a building. Housing societies also have their own procedures, but society approval does not necessarily replace municipal permission where it is legally required.
The BMC’s action therefore places a routine civic process in the spotlight. It also illustrates how enforcement can move from a written warning to on-site intervention if officials believe work has continued in breach of a stop-work direction.
Ajay Devgn’s Latest Film Keeps the Spotlight on Bollywood
The civic action comes as Devgn remains in the news for his film career. His latest release, Drishyam 3, arrived in theatres on October 2 and has reportedly crossed the Rs 400 crore mark at the global box office. The film is the third instalment in the crime-thriller series, which centres on Vijay Salgaonkar and his family as they face the consequences of a crime and the investigation that follows.
Directed by Abhishek Pathak, the film also features Shriya Saran, Tabu and Akshaye Khanna. Reviews have been largely positive, with audiences and critics responding to the performances, suspense and plot twists. The franchise has built a loyal following by combining family drama with a tightly constructed mystery, making each new chapter a major talking point for Bollywood viewers.
The reported box-office milestone adds to the film’s visibility, while the bungalow story has generated a separate stream of headlines. Together, the developments show how a Bollywood star’s public profile can connect entertainment news with wider issues such as property regulation and civic accountability.
A Franchise at a Turning Point
Drishyam 3 also represents the latest chapter in a story that has kept audiences debating how far Vijay Salgaonkar will go to protect his family. The series’ appeal rests not only on its twists but on the tension between personal loyalty and the demands of an investigation. With the third film described as the franchise’s final instalment, discussion has also turned to whether the story should end here rather than continue into another sequel.
For now, the BMC’s action at Devgn’s Juhu bungalow and the performance of Drishyam 3 remain distinct stories: one concerns municipal permissions and construction, while the other is a major Bollywood release. Both, however, have placed the actor at the centre of public conversation, drawing attention from residents, film fans and entertainment observers alike.
